![premier aircraft design md-11 premier aircraft design md-11](https://www.airplaneshop.com/media/catalog/product/cache/efcfbff9dbb0012617cb8430eed1e834/g/7/g7810_1_1.jpg)
First of all, the Tu-204 was so badly constructed, that from an engineering point of view, the FAA refused to certify the Tu-204 to fly there! Tu-204 is known as being one of the worst aircraft for a number of reasons. But just as with the 757 (more on that one later!) the Tu-204 suffers due to many different reasons. The Tu-204 was supposed to be Russia’s answer to the 757. Tupolev Tu-204 Editorial Team Tupolev Tu 204
PREMIER AIRCRAFT DESIGN MD 11 WINDOWS
The windows are also incredibly small, which means anyone who suffers from travel sickness or is scared of flying can’t see out of the window to calm themselves down! 8. For anyone who’s almost six feet tall, your head will touch the ceiling! The seats are renowned for being almost too small to do any work in. However, unlike other regional jets, the CRJ200 is incredibly cramped. The CRJ is a regional jet, just as many of Bombardier’s other aircraft have been (the rest being business jets). However, the worst among them is the CRJ200. Bombardier CRJ-200 Editorial Team Bombardier CRJ 200 Deltaīombardier is known for making some aircraft that are amazing like the A220 and Challenger 350. The A340 has a cruising speed of Mach 0.86, which is noticeably slower than the Mach 0.89 of the Boeing 777 (which often flies similar routes!) 9. This sluggishness is also seen in the A340’s cruising speed. This means that passengers are often left “popping” their ears for longer than they would on similar aircraft. Passengers often notice that the A340 takes longer to get airborne and to cruising altitude. Almost as though the A340 doesn’t have powerful enough engines to get it off the ground. To many passengers, there is a noticeable sluggishness to the A340. The A340 isn’t as much dangerous, as it is sluggish. Airbus A340 Editorial Team Airbus A340-600 Cathay Pacific However, the 737-200 is also one of the noisiest aircraft, even by the standards of the 1960’s! 10. That alone could make it one of the worst aircraft.
![premier aircraft design md-11 premier aircraft design md-11](https://aerosoft-shop.com/shop-rd/bilder/screenshots/fsx/skysimulations-md11-v2/skysim-md11-(1).jpg)
In fact, it is often considered to be one of the most dangerous aircraft ever built- of the 1095 of these aircraft that were built, 96 of them crashed! The Boeing 737-200 is also perhaps one of the worst aircraft for many reasons.įirstly, the 737-200 is extremely dangerous. That aircraft was the 737-200, one of only three aircraft to have ever been grounded! Boeing 737-200 Editorial Team Boeing 737 200īefore the 737 MAX was known for being dangerous, there was another 737 that was known for being dangerous. Some made the list simply due to being outdated, and it doesn’t mean it wasn’t a great craft at some point in history.ġ1. Please don’t be offended if you see your favorite aircraft on this list. Others are just plain dangerous, terribly outdated, or both! This is often related to things like getting passengers and cargo in and out in an efficient manner. Some aircraft are considered bad because they are a pain to accommodate for airports. If we are trying to concentrate and the cabin is so loud we can’t read or work, or the seats are a pain in the behind, we perceive an aircraft as being the worst aircraft ever. The aircraft itself makes a huge difference. Whilst the airline’s service certainly plays a part in how we perceive a certain aircraft, you can’t blame them for everything. People tend to believe that it’s the airline that operates the aircraft as much as the aircraft itself.